Highscore 55 · flagged Thursday, September 10, 2026

0utl00k.online

Appeared in the .online zone on Thursday, September 10, 2026; by the end of that day the census found robots.txt denied. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand spelled with digits
matched: 0utl00k→outlook
+35
brand plus digits
matched: 0utl00k
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: HOSTINGER operations, UAB
+8
brand name at a watch-list registrar
matched: HOSTINGER operations, UAB
+6
Registrar
HOSTINGER operations, UAB
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
cosmos.dns-parking.com, nova.dns-parking.com
First-day state
robots.txt denied
HTTP status
Page title
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
outlook

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Microsoft Outlookconfidence 72%· claude-opus-5

0utl00k.online is a pure leetspeak substitution of 'outlook' (0 for o), a Microsoft mail brand the registrant plainly does not own, registered at a cheap retail registrar on Hostinger parking nameservers; no page content was retrievable (robots-denied), so there is no observed credential form yet, but the name has no plausible non-deceptive use and is consistent with staging an Outlook webmail phish.

First passlooks like abusetarget: Microsoft Outlookconfidence 85%· claude-haiku-4-5

Domain uses leet-speak substitution (0utl00k) to impersonate Outlook, combined with parking nameservers and a watch-list registrar pattern typical of typosquats. No accessible content to confirm phishing intent, but the name alone—designed to deceive—with infrastructure pointing to parking suggests brand-squat abuse rather than active phishing.

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/0utl00k.online. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.