Highscore 55 · flagged Friday, October 2, 2026

1z-icloud.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Friday, October 2, 2026; by the end of that day the census found no web server. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: icloud
+30
brand plus digits
matched: 1z-icloud
+8
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
free DNS provider
matched: dnsowl.com
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: NameSilo,LLC
+8
brand name at a watch-list registrar
matched: NameSilo,LLC
+6
Registrar
NameSilo,LLC
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.dnsowl.com, ns2.dnsowl.com, ns3.dnsowl.com
First-day state
no web server
HTTP status
—
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
icloud

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Apple (iCloud)confidence 70%· claude-opus-5-5

The name pairs Apple's distinctive 'icloud' brand with a throwaway '1z-' prefix on a .top domain, registered through NameSilo with DNSOwl nameservers. That pattern is typical of iCloud-unlock and Find My phishing kits, and Apple would not register such a name. No web content was served, so this is a brand-squat rather than confirmed phishing.

First passlooks like abusetarget: icloudconfidence 44%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.53 suspicious:0.41 unreachable:0.04 | impersonates=0.73 credential=0.10 parked=0.86 evidence=1.0 | target=icloud:1.00

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/1z-icloud.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.