app-telegram.bond
Appeared in the .bond zone on Friday, October 23, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
What matched
Model opinions
The name 'app-telegram.bond' squats the distinctive Telegram brand on a cheap .bond TLD via Gname. The root returns a Caddy 404 saying 'entrance does not exist, get the entrance address from the publisher' (入口不存在), which suggests a gated kit served only on tokenised paths. Since no impersonating content is visible, this is a brand-squat rather than confirmed phishing.
typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.67 suspicious:0.29 benign:0.03 | impersonates=0.45 credential=0.02 parked=0.94 evidence=1.0 | target=telegram:0.99
A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.
What the page looked like on Friday, October 23, 2026
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/app-telegram.bond. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.