app-telegram.food
Appeared in the .food zone on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
What matched
Model opinions
The name 'app-telegram' on an unrelated .food TLD squats the Telegram brand. It was registered through Gname with share-dns nameservers, and it serves a Chinese 404 page reading 'entrance does not exist, confirm the link is complete or contact the publisher for the entrance address', which is typical of a path-gated kit that only shows content to visitors holding a distributed link. No credential form is visible yet, so this is a brand-squat rather than confirmed phishing.
typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.61 suspicious:0.35 benign:0.03 | impersonates=0.34 credential=0.02 parked=0.92 evidence=1.0 | target=telegram:0.98
A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.
What the page looked like on Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/app-telegram.food. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.