Highscore 46 · flagged Thursday, October 8, 2026

aramexpost.cfd

Appeared in the .cfd zone on Thursday, October 8, 2026; by the end of that day the census found boilerplate page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: aramex
+30
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: cfd
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: NameMart Pte. Ltd.
+8
Registrar
NameMart Pte. Ltd.
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.domainnamens.com, ns2.domainnamens.com
First-day state
boilerplate page
HTTP status
404
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
aramex

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Aramexconfidence 80%· claude-opus-5-5

The name pairs the distinctive courier brand 'aramex' with 'post' on a cheap .cfd TLD through a retail registrar, a common shape for parcel-delivery phishing. The server returns only a bare 404 with no content, form or links, so this is a brand-squat that Aramex would not plausibly own, not yet an active phish.

First passlooks like abusetarget: aramexconfidence 45%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.54 suspicious:0.31 benign:0.10 | impersonates=0.63 credential=0.04 parked=0.87 evidence=1.0 | target=aramex:1.00

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 8, 2026

Screenshot of aramexpost.cfd taken by the zone census on 2026-10-08

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/aramexpost.cfd. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.