Highscore 46 · flagged Tuesday, November 3, 2026

aramexposta.skin

Appeared in the .skin zone on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; by the end of that day the census found boilerplate page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: aramex
+30
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: skin
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: NameMart Pte. Ltd.
+8
Registrar
NameMart Pte. Ltd.
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.domainnamens.com, ns2.domainnamens.com
First-day state
boilerplate page
HTTP status
404
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
aramex

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Aramexconfidence 80%· claude-opus-5-5

The name joins the distinctive courier brand 'aramex' with 'posta' (post) on a cheap .skin TLD through a retail registrar, which matches the usual shape of parcel-delivery phishing. The page is only a bare nginx 404 with no form or links, so this is a content-less brand-squat rather than live phishing.

First passlooks like abusetarget: aramexconfidence 52%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.60 suspicious:0.32 benign:0.06 | impersonates=0.69 credential=0.04 parked=0.91 evidence=1.0 | target=aramex:1.00

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Screenshot of aramexposta.skin taken by the zone census on 2026-11-03

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/aramexposta.skin. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.