Highscore 54 · flagged Thursday, November 5, 2026

aubank.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Thursday, November 5, 2026; by the end of that day the census found suspended. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

one-letter brand typo
matched: aubank≈nubank
+28
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
curitiba.ns.porkbun.com, fortaleza.ns.porkbun.com, maceio.ns.porkbun.com, salvador.ns.porkbun.com
First-day state
suspended
HTTP status
200
Page title
porkbun.com | expired domain
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
nubank

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: AU Small Finance Bankconfidence 70%· claude-opus-5-5

The name 'aubank' matches AU Small Finance Bank (real domain aubank.in), not Nubank, and sits on a cheap .top TLD. The domain is already suspended and shows only Porkbun's expired-domain placeholder, whose only form is Porkbun's domain search, so there is no live phish but it is a clear brand-squat.

First passlooks like abuseconfidence 46%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.55 benign:0.35 suspicious:0.10 | impersonates=0.27 credential=0.14 parked=0.94 evidence=1.1 | target=nubank:0.95

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, November 5, 2026

Screenshot of aubank.top taken by the zone census on 2026-11-05

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/aubank.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.