Criticalscore 60 · flagged Friday, September 25, 2026

binancechain.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Friday, September 25, 2026; by the end of that day the census found active website about crypto web3. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: binance
+30
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
page impersonates a brand
matched: Binance
+22
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.gadomains.com, ns2.gadomains.com
First-day state
active website
HTTP status
200
Page title
Warden Protocol
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
binance

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like phishingtarget: Warden Protocolconfidence 80%· claude-opus-5-5

The page is a clone of Warden Protocol's site, hosted on a Binance-squat name (binancechain.top). It announces a fake 'internal $WARD private allocation' via YZi Labs, gated by a WhatsApp 'official community', and tells visitors to fund Binance Web3/Bitget wallets with ETH/USDC. This is a classic presale drainer lure.

First passlooks like a scamtarget: binanceconfidence 42%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=scam:0.51 phishing:0.21 suspicious:0.17 | impersonates=0.65 credential=0.16 parked=0.16 evidence=2.0 | target=binance:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Friday, September 25, 2026

Screenshot of binancechain.top taken by the zone census on 2026-09-25

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/binancechain.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.