Mediumscore 38 · flagged Sunday, November 1, 2026

bpihsbc.com

Appeared in the .com zone on Sunday, November 1, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: hsbc
+30
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: Dominet (HK) Limited
+8
Registrar
Dominet (HK) Limited
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns7.alidns.com, ns8.alidns.com
First-day state
empty page
HTTP status
404
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
hsbc

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: HSBCconfidence 72%· claude-opus-5-5

The name joins two bank brands, BPI and HSBC, on a fresh Dominet (HK)/Alidns registration that neither bank would plausibly use. The site only returns a GoFrame JSON 404 API stub with no content, which fits a brand-squat or a backend for a later lure; there is no live phishing page yet.

First passlooks like abuseconfidence 85%· claude-haiku-4-5

Domain name contains HSBC (a major bank brand) in a typosquat pattern (bpihsbc.com), but the page returns a 404 error with no content. This is a classic brand-squat: the domain's only plausible purpose is deception through name confusion, not a currently active phishing attack. The use of Alidns nameservers and a Hong Kong registrar is consistent with typosquat infrastructure.

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/bpihsbc.com. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.