Highscore 52 · flagged Thursday, October 8, 2026

calorietracker.date

Appeared in the .date zone on Thursday, October 8, 2026; by the end of that day the census found redirects elsewhere. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

lure words (login, verify, secure…)
matched: track
+6
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: date
+8
brand in page title, not in the name
matched: cloudflare
+20
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
leia.ns.cloudflare.com, walt.ns.cloudflare.com
First-day state
redirects elsewhere
HTTP status
200
Page title
Sign in ・ Cloudflare Access
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
—

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks benignconfidence 88%· claude-opus-5-5

The domain redirects to a genuine Cloudflare Access (Zero Trust) gate on cloudflareaccess.com, reading 'Log in to calorietracker.date'. This is the owner putting their own site behind Cloudflare's auth, not impersonation, and 'calorietracker' is a generic name rather than a brand.

First passlooks benignconfidence 69%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=benign:0.74 suspicious:0.17 phishing:0.07 | impersonates=0.25 credential=0.90 parked=0.64 evidence=1.7 | target=none:0.86

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 8, 2026

Screenshot of calorietracker.date taken by the zone census on 2026-10-08

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/calorietracker.date. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.