Highscore 54 · flagged Thursday, October 8, 2026

ddmti.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Thursday, October 8, 2026; by the end of that day the census found redirects elsewhere. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
free DNS provider
matched: dnsowl.com
+8
brand in page title, not in the name
matched: google
+20
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
NameSilo,LLC
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.dnsowl.com, ns2.dnsowl.com, ns3.dnsowl.com
First-day state
redirects elsewhere
HTTP status
200
Page title
Google
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
—

Model opinions

Second opinionsuspiciousconfidence 55%· claude-opus-5-5

The random 5-letter .top name (NameSilo/dnsowl) serves no content of its own and redirects to www.google.com, so the Google page and search form belong to Google and are not impersonation. Bouncing visitors to google.com is a common cloaking pattern for phishing kits that filter scanners, but nothing deceptive is shown yet.

First passlooks benignconfidence 53%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=benign:0.61 suspicious:0.24 phishing:0.08 | impersonates=0.32 credential=0.46 parked=0.65 evidence=1.4 | target=none:0.61

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 8, 2026

Screenshot of ddmti.top taken by the zone census on 2026-10-08

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/ddmti.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.