Highscore 46 · flagged Wednesday, October 21, 2026

deepmanor38.click

Appeared in the .click zone on Wednesday, October 21, 2026; by the end of that day the census found redirects elsewhere. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: click
+8
brand in page title, not in the name
matched: google
+20
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
Dynadot, LLC
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
adaline.ns.cloudflare.com, drake.ns.cloudflare.com
First-day state
redirects elsewhere
HTTP status
200
Page title
Google
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
—

Model opinions

Second opinionsuspiciousconfidence 55%· claude-opus-5-5

The domain serves no content of its own and redirects to the real www.google.com, so the Google branding and form are not impersonation. Its throwaway word-plus-number name on a cheap .click TLD behind Cloudflare matches a batch-registered cloaking shape, where scanners see Google and targeted visitors may get something else, but nothing malicious is shown yet.

First passlooks benignconfidence 47%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=benign:0.56 suspicious:0.25 phishing:0.11 | impersonates=0.33 credential=0.49 parked=0.59 evidence=1.6 | target=none:0.64

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Screenshot of deepmanor38.click taken by the zone census on 2026-10-21

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/deepmanor38.click. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.