foogle.bond
Appeared in the .bond zone on Sunday, September 20, 2026; by the end of that day the census found active website. Full domain report
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
What matched
Model opinions
foogle.bond is a one-character typosquat of google.com, but the served page shows no Google branding — only a dark 'PROFESSOR / PRIVATE ACCESS' gate asking for an access code, with the form posting to itself and zero offsite links. A code-gated sealed room on a brand-typo name is a classic cloaked phishing/panel front, but without visible impersonation content the evidence is not yet decisive.
The domain 'foogle.bond' is a Google typosquat with a form posting to itself (sealed-room phishing pattern), but the page content says 'Private Access' and 'Access code' with no Google branding, logos, or impersonation language. This could be phishing infrastructure awaiting credential capture, or a generic password-wall page; the typosquat + self-posting form is strong abuse/phishing signal, but the absence of Google impersonation on the page itself leaves some ambiguity about the intended targ
A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.
What the page looked like on Sunday, September 20, 2026
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/foogle.bond. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.