Highscore 40 · flagged Tuesday, October 20, 2026

gaulerevolution.site

Appeared in the .site zone on Tuesday, October 20, 2026; by the end of that day the census found active website about blogs & personal. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: revolut
+14
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co
+8
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
dns01.muumuu-domain.com, dns02.muumuu-domain.com
First-day state
active website
HTTP status
200
Page title
blog
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
revolut

Model opinions

First passsuspicioustarget: Revolutconfidence 65%· claude-haiku-4-5

The domain contains 'revolut' (Revolut's brand name) but the page is a generic Japanese-language blog template with no Revolut branding, logos, or login forms visible. The scorer flagged 'form-on-brand-page' but the forms shown are search-only (GET to self), not credential-capture forms. The sealed-room architecture (forms posting to self, no offsite links) and brand-in-name are suspicious signals, but the absence of actual impersonation content—no Revolut logo, no login attempt, no financial/ac

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Screenshot of gaulerevolution.site taken by the zone census on 2026-10-20

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/gaulerevolution.site. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.