Highscore 46 · flagged Friday, October 23, 2026

gmailmax.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Friday, October 23, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: gmail
+30
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
free DNS provider
matched: dnsowl.com
+8
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.dnsowl.com, ns2.dnsowl.com, ns3.dnsowl.com
First-day state
empty page
HTTP status
200
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
gmail

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abuseconfidence 85%· claude-opus-5-5

The page is a bulk-account storefront selling pre-registered Gmail accounts ("No phone No QR | Random IP", 0.52–0.85 USD, hundreds in stock) with a Telegram operator contact (@hotdog65887), which supports spam and fraud. It sits under a Gmail brand-squat name with a Gmail-style logo. It does not pose as Google to capture credentials, so this is abuse rather than phishing.

First passlooks like abusetarget: gmailconfidence 65%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.71 suspicious:0.27 benign:0.01 | impersonates=0.64 credential=0.07 parked=0.89 evidence=1.0 | target=gmail:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Friday, October 23, 2026

Screenshot of gmailmax.top taken by the zone census on 2026-10-23

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/gmailmax.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.