Criticalscore 68 · flagged Tuesday, November 10, 2026

lalasign.cloud

Appeared in the .cloud zone on Tuesday, November 10, 2026; by the end of that day the census found active website about government ngo. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

page asks for credentials
matched: Sign in to your account
+30
brand in page title, not in the name
matched: docusign
+20
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
lunar.dns-parking.com, solar.dns-parking.com
First-day state
active website
HTTP status
200
Page title
Sign In - Documenso
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
—

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks benignconfidence 80%· claude-opus-5-5

The page is a stock self-hosted Documenso sign-in (Documenso is an open-source e-signature platform) with its own sign-up and passkey options, under a non-typosquat name, 'lalasign'. Nothing on the page claims to be DocuSign: no DocuSign logo, wording or document-lure language, so the scorer's 'docusign' brand match appears to be a false hit on 'Documenso'.

First passlooks like phishingconfidence 81%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=phishing:0.84 suspicious:0.11 abuse:0.03 | impersonates=0.91 credential=0.98 parked=0.15 evidence=2.8

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Screenshot of lalasign.cloud taken by the zone census on 2026-11-10

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/lalasign.cloud. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.