Highscore 50 · flagged Wednesday, October 28, 2026

postinger.click

Appeared in the .click zone on Wednesday, October 28, 2026; by the end of that day the census found placeholder page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

one-letter brand typo
matched: postinger≈hostinger
+28
TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: click
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: NAMECHEAP
+8
brand name at a watch-list registrar
matched: NAMECHEAP
+6
Registrar
NAMECHEAP
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com
First-day state
placeholder page
HTTP status
200
Page title
Index of /
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
hostinger

Model opinions

Second opinionsuspiciousconfidence 60%· claude-opus-5-5

The page is an empty LiteSpeed 'Index of /' listing with only cgi-bin, no form and no offsite links, so nothing is impersonated yet. The name 'postinger' is one letter off 'hostinger' on a cheap .click TLD, but it also reads as a plausible coinage from 'posting', so the squat is not clear-cut.

First passlooks like abuseconfidence 74%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.78 suspicious:0.11 benign:0.11 | impersonates=0.23 credential=0.03 parked=0.96 evidence=1.1 | target=hostinger:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Screenshot of postinger.click taken by the zone census on 2026-10-28

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/postinger.click. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.