Highscore 54 · flagged Tuesday, September 8, 2026

rqtkj.top

Appeared in the .top zone on Tuesday, September 8, 2026; by the end of that day the census found redirects elsewhere. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

TLD with a high abuse rate
matched: top
+8
free DNS provider
matched: dnsowl.com
+8
brand in page title, not in the name
matched: google
+20
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
Registrar
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.dnsowl.com, ns2.dnsowl.com, ns3.dnsowl.com
First-day state
redirects elsewhere
HTTP status
200
Page title
Google
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed

Model opinions

First passsuspicioustarget: Googleconfidence 72%· claude-haiku-4-5

Domain rqtkj.top with no brand signal in its name redirects to legitimate www.google.com, but the combination of a generic .top TLD, free DNS hosting (dnsowl.com), and a redirect-only setup is consistent with redirect-based phishing infrastructure. The domain itself does not impersonate Google, but its infrastructure pattern (throwaway name + free DNS + offsite redirect to a real login page) is typical of campaigns that send users to Google Sign-in after credential interception elsewhere, or pre

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Screenshot of rqtkj.top taken by the zone census on 2026-09-08

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/rqtkj.top. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.