Highscore 55 · flagged Thursday, October 8, 2026

slackcn.dev

Appeared in the .dev zone on Thursday, October 8, 2026; by the end of that day the census found redirects elsewhere. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: slack
+30
form on a brand-styled page
matched: has_form
+18
brand name redirects elsewhere
matched: vercel.com
+8
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.vercel-dns.com, ns2.vercel-dns.com
First-day state
redirects elsewhere
HTTP status
200
Page title
Login – Vercel
Has a form
yes
Brand echoed
slack

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Slackconfidence 55%· claude-opus-5-5

The name 'slackcn' builds on the distinctive Slack brand plus a 'cn' region suffix, and the domain does not belong to Slack. The Vercel login redirect is Vercel's own deployment-protection SSO gate (nonce/sso-api URL on vercel.com), not a credential grab by this domain, so the content is hidden and the name itself is the deceptive element.

First passlooks benignconfidence 59%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=benign:0.66 suspicious:0.21 abuse:0.07 | impersonates=0.24 credential=0.80 parked=0.70 evidence=1.5 | target=slack:0.73

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 8, 2026

Screenshot of slackcn.dev taken by the zone census on 2026-10-08

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/slackcn.dev. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.