Highscore 50 · flagged Wednesday, October 21, 2026

team-aupost-clients.help

Appeared in the .help zone on Wednesday, October 21, 2026; by the end of that day the census found robots.txt denied. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

one-letter brand typo
matched: aupost≈auspost
+28
free DNS provider
matched: dnsowl.com
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: NameSilo, LLC
+8
brand name at a watch-list registrar
matched: NameSilo, LLC
+6
Registrar
NameSilo, LLC
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.dnsowl.com, ns2.dnsowl.com, ns3.dnsowl.com
First-day state
robots.txt denied
HTTP status
—
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
auspost

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Australia Postconfidence 72%· claude-opus-5-5

The name 'team-aupost-clients.help' is a typo-squat of AusPost ('aupost'≈'auspost'), padded with support-style words on a .help TLD. That is the typical shape of Australia Post parcel-lure domains, registered here via NameSilo with dnsowl DNS. No page content was captured (robots-denied), so this is a brand-squat with no visible lure yet rather than confirmed phishing.

First passlooks like abusetarget: auspostconfidence 58%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.65 suspicious:0.33 benign:0.01 | impersonates=0.64 credential=0.06 parked=0.79 evidence=1.0 | target=auspost:1.00

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/team-aupost-clients.help. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.