Highscore 51 · flagged Saturday, September 26, 2026

trez0r.org

Appeared in the .org zone on Saturday, September 26, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand spelled with digits
matched: trez0r→trezor
+35
brand plus digits
matched: trez0r
+8
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: CNOBIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
+8
Registrar
CNOBIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.pql.net, ns2.pql.net
First-day state
empty page
HTTP status
200
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
trezor

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Trezorconfidence 80%· claude-opus-5-5

The name 'trez0r' is a leetspeak typosquat of Trezor, the hardware crypto-wallet brand and a common phishing target. The page returns HTTP 200 on nginx with no title, text or form, so it is a brand-squat with no visible deceptive content yet, and its only plausible purpose is impersonation.

First passlooks like abuseconfidence 60%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.67 suspicious:0.25 benign:0.07 | impersonates=0.34 credential=0.06 parked=0.78 evidence=1.0 | target=trezor:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Saturday, September 26, 2026

Screenshot of trez0r.org taken by the zone census on 2026-09-26

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/trez0r.org. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.