Highscore 51 · flagged Thursday, October 22, 2026

trustwallet.digital

Appeared in the .digital zone on Thursday, October 22, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

brand in the name
matched: trustwallet
+10
lure words (login, verify, secure…)
matched: wallet
+26
brand name and brand-styled page
matched: trustwallet
+15
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.sedoparking.com, ns2.sedoparking.com
First-day state
empty page
HTTP status
200
Page title
trustwallet.digital
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
trustwallet

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Trust Walletconfidence 74%· claude-opus-5-5

The name is the distinctive crypto-wallet brand 'trustwallet' on a .digital TLD the brand does not use. It sits on Sedo parking nameservers with a blank page, no form and no links, so it is a brand-squat with no visible phishing content yet. Crypto-wallet squats like this are commonly later turned into seed-phrase phishing pages.

First passlooks like abuseconfidence 46%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.55 benign:0.39 suspicious:0.06 | impersonates=0.40 credential=0.03 parked=0.98 evidence=1.5 | target=trustwallet:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 22, 2026

Screenshot of trustwallet.digital taken by the zone census on 2026-10-22

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/trustwallet.digital. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.