Highscore 52 · flagged Friday, October 30, 2026

vidia.pro

Appeared in the .pro zone on Friday, October 30, 2026; by the end of that day the census found boilerplate page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

one-letter brand typo
matched: vidia≈nvidia
+28
brand name at a retail registrar
matched: Spaceship, Inc.
+8
brand name at a watch-list registrar
matched: Spaceship, Inc.
+6
identical page on many newborns
matched: 51 identical pages
+10
Registrar
Spaceship, Inc.
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
launch1.spaceship.net, launch2.spaceship.net
First-day state
boilerplate page
HTTP status
456
Page title
—
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
nvidia

Model opinions

Second opinionsuspiciousconfidence 50%· claude-opus-5-5

vidia.pro is one letter short of 'nvidia', but 'Vidia' is also a standalone name, and the page is a blank HTTP 456 shell with no title, form or links. The 51 identical pages look like the registrar's (Spaceship) default boilerplate rather than a campaign, so the typo signal is real but not decisive.

First passlooks like abusetarget: nvidiaconfidence 65%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.71 suspicious:0.24 benign:0.04 | impersonates=0.60 credential=0.05 parked=0.87 evidence=1.1 | target=nvidia:1.00

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Friday, October 30, 2026

Screenshot of vidia.pro taken by the zone census on 2026-10-30

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/vidia.pro. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.