Highscore 54 · flagged Thursday, October 29, 2026

xn--tustwallet-i7b.app

Appeared in the .app zone on Thursday, October 29, 2026; by the end of that day the census found empty page. Full domain report

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

What matched

punycode name
matched: třustwallet scripts=LATIN
+18
brand in the name
matched: trustwallet
+10
lure words (login, verify, secure…)
matched: wallet
+26
Registrar
—
Nameserver provider
Nameservers
ns1.vercel-dns.com, ns2.vercel-dns.com
First-day state
empty page
HTTP status
404
Page title
404: NOT_FOUND
Has a form
no
Brand echoed
trustwallet

Model opinions

Second opinionlooks like abusetarget: Trust Walletconfidence 82%· claude-opus-5-5

The punycode name decodes to 'třustwallet', a Latin-diacritic homograph of the Trust Wallet crypto brand, and its only plausible purpose is deception. It is pointed at Vercel but currently serves only a DEPLOYMENT_NOT_FOUND 404 with no form, so it is a staged brand-squat rather than a live phish yet.

First passlooks like abusetarget: trustwalletconfidence 87%· typesafe/jev-latest

typesafe first pass (gate 0.4): p=abuse:0.89 suspicious:0.10 benign:0.01 | impersonates=0.70 credential=0.03 parked=0.94 evidence=1.0 | target=trustwallet:0.99

A model looked at the screenshot and page text and wrote what it thought. It can be wrong, and it is not a finding.

What the page looked like on Thursday, October 29, 2026

Screenshot of xn--tustwallet-i7b.app taken by the zone census on 2026-10-29

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/domain/xn--tustwallet-i7b.app. This page is not indexed by search engines and does not link to the site it describes.