Flagged newborn domains, Friday, August 28, 2026

4 names at tier critical or above in .top, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Criticalinstagram18plus.topscore 80echoes instagram· active website
brand in the nameinstagrambrand plus digitsinstagram18plusTLD with a high abuse ratetopbrand name behind Cloudflarecloudflare.com+2 more

Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: Google Play / Instagram (Meta)), confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalcashcat-token.topscore 68· active website
TLD with a high abuse ratetoppage impersonates a brandBinancebrand in page title, not in the namebinanceform on a brand-styled pagehas_form

Model opinion: looks like a scam, confidence 82%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalopenseva.topscore 68echoes opensea· active website
one-letter brand typoopenseva≈openseaTLD with a high abuse ratetopbrand name on a rarely-seen nameserversolidhosting.probrand name at a retail registrarOpenprovider+1 more

Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalteosbet-mobilerisimim.topscore 60echoes tmobile· active website
brand in the nametmobileTLD with a high abuse ratetopbrand name behind Cloudflarecloudflare.combrand name at a retail registrarDynadot LLC+2 more

Model opinion: looks like abuse, confidence 62%. An opinion, not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-08-28&tier=critical. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.