Flagged newborn domains, Monday, August 31, 2026

4 names at tier high or above in .vip, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Criticaltelegram-ka9.vipscore 67echoes telegram· active website
brand in the nametelegrambrand plus digitstelegram-ka9brand name behind Cloudflarecloudflare.combrand name at a retail registrarJuly Name Limited+1 more

Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: Telegram), confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.

Hightrustwallets.vipscore 55echoes trustwallet· no DNS
brand in the nametrustwalletlure words (login, verify, secure…)walletbrand name behind Cloudflarecloudflare.combrand name at a retail registrarDynadot Inc+1 more
Highitau777.vipscore 46echoes itau· active website
brand in the nameitaubrand plus digitsitau777brand name at a retail registrarGoDaddy.com, LLC

Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Itaú), confidence 78%. An opinion, not a finding.

Highdizipal-cloud.vipscore 42echoes icloud· active website
one-letter brand typocloud≈icloudbrand name at a retail registrarSpaceship, Inc.brand name at a watch-list registrarSpaceship, Inc.

Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 92%. An opinion, not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-08-31&tier=high. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.