Flagged newborn domains, Tuesday, September 1, 2026

4 names at tier high or above in .tech, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Critical+High+Medium+Low+day:09-03 09-02 09-01 08-31 08-30 08-29 08-28 08-27 clear filters

Highvericon.techscore 52echoes verizon· registrar placeholder

one-letter brand typo “vericon≈verizon”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”identical page on many newborns “4339 identical pages”

Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 92%. An opinion, not a finding.

Highpampanga-farmerregistry.techscore 44· active website

page asks for credentials “Sign in to your account”login form “has_form+login words”

Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: Province of Pampanga (Philippine provincial government / RSBSA farmer registry)), confidence 82%. An opinion, not a finding.

Highscauzwgc-cloud.techscore 42echoes icloud· no DNS

one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name at a retail registrar “Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChi”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChi”

Hightcloud.techscore 42echoes icloud· no DNS

one-letter brand typo “tcloud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Cloudflare, Inc.”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-09-01&tier=high. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.