TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 58%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Robinhood), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “chatgpt”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Robinhood), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “wordpress”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
brand in the name “whatsapp”brand plus digits “pop3-whatsapp”brand name at a retail registrar “GKG.Net, Inc.”
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 62%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand in page title, not in the name “taobao”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like abuse, confidence 86%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “cfd”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “stripe”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
TLD with a high abuse rate “lol”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like a scam, confidence 78%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 56%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “revolut”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
brand in the name “stripe”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
TLD with a high abuse rate “sbs”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Robinhood), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “lineme”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “lazada”brand plus digits “sanca999lazada5”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”+1 more
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 92%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “shopee”brand plus digits “shopee-100”brand name at a retail registrar “PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com”
TLD with a high abuse rate “work”brand in page title, not in the name “whatsapp”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 92%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 68%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “icu”brand in page title, not in the name “cloudflare”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
brand in the name “wordpress”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “wordpress”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “taobao”brand plus digits “taobao1088”brand name at a retail registrar “TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown”
brand in the name “wordpress”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
TLD with a high abuse rate “click”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Google), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “click”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 68%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “tiktok”brand plus digits “tiktok-833”brand name at a retail registrar “TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown”
brand in the name “tiktok”brand plus digits “tiktok-8kzb”brand name at a retail registrar “TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown”
brand in the name “tiktok”brand plus digits “tiktok-h5”brand name at a retail registrar “TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown”
TLD with a high abuse rate “click”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like a scam, confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Robinhood), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “gmail”brand plus digits “uedersonlemes12gmail”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc.”
one-letter brand typo “unilswap≈uniswap”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc.”identical page on many newborns “3487 identical pages”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “usaa”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
brand in the name “usaa”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
brand in the name “usaa”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
brand in the name “usaa”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.co”
one-letter brand typo “finance≈binance”brand name at a retail registrar “InterNetX GmbH”identical page on many newborns “299 identical pages”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “finance≈binance”brand name at a retail registrar “InterNetX GmbH”identical page on many newborns “299 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 82%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “date”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.