brand in the name “quickbooks”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: quickbooks), confidence 73%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “rakuten”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”brand name redirects elsewhere “puchipura-lovers.info”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Rakuten), confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “tiktok”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “secure”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: tiktok), confidence 91%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “ebay”TLD with a high abuse rate “autos”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious (target: ebay), confidence 41%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “smbc”brand plus digits “smbcrad-1jp”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc.”identical page on many newborns “2755 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: SMBC (Sumitomo Mitsui Card)), confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “starlink”brand name and brand-styled page “starlink”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: Starlink), confidence 70%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “icloud”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Apple (iCloud)), confidence 70%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “spotify”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: spotify), confidence 84%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “autos”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “beauty”brand name at a retail registrar “Dynadot Inc”+1 more
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “click”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook (Meta)), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “homes”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook (Meta)), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “lol”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “monster”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook (Meta)), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “quest”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “sbs”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook (Meta)), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “facebook”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Facebook), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “robinhood”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”brand plus digits “supportrobinhood247”brand name at a retail registrar “HOSTINGER operations, UAB”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Robinhood), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “trustwallet”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “wallet”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: trustwallet), confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “telegram”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “bonus”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “tiktok”brand name at a retail registrar “Porkbun LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Porkbun LLC”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “tiktok”brand plus digits “tiktok88skw”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious (target: tiktok), confidence 54%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “trezor”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “wallet”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: trezor), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “vanguard”TLD with a high abuse rate “click”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Dynadot, LLC”+1 more
Model opinion: unreachable when judged, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “verified”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”brand in page title, not in the name “facebook”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Meta (Facebook)), confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “verizon”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “reward,rewards”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: verizon), confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “mobile≈tmobile”brand plus digits “vulkan24-mobile”TLD with a high abuse rate “fun”brand name at a retail registrar “Dynadot Inc”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious (target: tmobile), confidence 44%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “walmart”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Walmart), confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “whatsapp”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Porkbun, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Porkbun, LLC”+1 more
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 50%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “strike≈stripe”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “win”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: stripe), confidence 43%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “wordpress”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “wordpress”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”very long name “35”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 63%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “zelle”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “support”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: zelle), confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand plus digits “420-cloud”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”identical page on many newborns “2755 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “finance≈binance”brand name at a retail registrar “Squarespace Domains LLC”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “gogle≈google”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand in page title, not in the name “cloudflare”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Google), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”very long name “30”brand in page title, not in the name “booking”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 90%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “winance≈binance”brand name at a retail registrar “Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like a scam, confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “gmail”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “NicNames, Inc.”brand name redirects elsewhere “nic.ua”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Gmail (Google)), confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “winance≈binance”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “login”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Binance), confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “google”brand name on a rarely-seen nameserver “vdsina.com”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: Google), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “hair”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”brand in page title, not in the name “halifax”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 90%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “wordpress”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “secure”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Cloudflare, Inc.”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “shopes≈shopee”brand name at a retail registrar “Name.com, Inc.”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “starting≈starling”brand name at a retail registrar “Name.com, Inc.”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “tiktok”brand plus digits “tiktok88viking”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”identical page on many newborns “44 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: TikTok), confidence 62%. An opinion, not a finding.