Flagged newborn domains, Thursday, October 15, 2026
11 names at tier low or above in .bond, highest score first.
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
brand in the name “slack”TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”+1 more
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand in page title, not in the name “booking”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 99%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand in page title, not in the name “hostinger”identical page on many newborns “87 identical pages”
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand in page title, not in the name “namecheap”
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”brand in page title, not in the name “robinhood”
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”login form “has_form+login words”
TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service”TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “bonus”TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service”TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “pay”TLD with a high abuse rate “bond”
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-15&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.