Flagged newborn domains, Thursday, October 15, 2026
13 names at tier low or above in .ink, highest score first.
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
brand in the name “microsoft”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com LLC”
one-letter brand typo “strike≈stripe”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Dynadot Inc”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Dynadot Inc”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Google Play), confidence 86%. An opinion, not a finding.
page impersonates a brand “Netflix”brand in page title, not in the name “google”
brand in page title, not in the name “booking”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
page asks for credentials “log in to your account”
brand in page title, not in the name “whatsapp”
brand in page title, not in the name “chatgpt”
punycode name “辽宁奶龙高中 scripts=CJK”
punycode name “腾讯阁 scripts=CJK”
punycode name “洛天依 scripts=CJK”
login form “has_form+login words”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-15&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.