Flagged newborn domains, Saturday, October 17, 2026

5 names at tier critical or above in .site, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Criticalroyalmailtracking.sitescore 80echoes royalmail· active website
brand in the name “royalmail”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “track,tracking”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”

Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Royal Mail), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalgoogle777.sitescore 64echoes google· active website
brand in the name “google”brand plus digits “google777”brand name at a retail registrar “Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”

Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Google), confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalrusaairductservices.sitescore 64echoes usaa· active website
brand in the name “usaa”lure words (login, verify, secure…) “service,services”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”

Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 65%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalbrewgrambot.sitescore 60· active website
page impersonates a brand “MetaMask”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”

Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.

Criticalvazouja.sitescore 60· active website
page impersonates a brand “PayPal”brand in page title, not in the name “telegram”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”

Model opinion: looks like abuse, confidence 75%. An opinion, not a finding.

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-17&tier=critical. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.