Flagged newborn domains, Monday, October 19, 2026

6,937 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.56”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.44”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.29”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.12”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.31”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.05”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.20”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.41”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.29”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.08”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.41”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.39”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.35”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.33”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.08”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.29”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.37”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=3.95”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.35”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.20”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.35”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.18”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.27”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.24”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.35”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.33”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “34”random-looking name “H=4.18”TLD with a high abuse rate “cfd”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.60”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.27”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.16”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
very long name “32”random-looking name “H=4.06”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”
Low0606.lolscore 16· no DNS
TLD with a high abuse rate “lol”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low111tttttthu5532ey.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low155577.xyzscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low22201tttttthu5532ey.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low3109e.topscore 16· active website
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low3331tttttthu5532ey.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low336483.xyzscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low4d2nqik972u4wso.icuscore 16· no web server
TLD with a high abuse rate “icu”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low599523.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low722299.xyzscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low732085.xyzscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low751005.xyzscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Low966132.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowa101harcaharcabitttmez.xyzscore 16· blocked the probe
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowaberrantarcana.xyzscore 16· no DNS
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowaboutpi.buzzscore 16· no DNS
TLD with a high abuse rate “buzz”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowactingx.topscore 16· robots.txt denied
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowadmiralx-gkl.topscore 16· blocked the probe
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”
Lowadmiralx-qam.topscore 16· blocked the probe
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”free DNS provider “dnsowl.com”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-19&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.