Flagged newborn domains, Monday, October 26, 2026

6,657 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001028ctxqokimnt629.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028dgkuzyxcpl184.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028dguddigavn769.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028dnvhkvmsor894.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028dzwcutouej769.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028eajvdjdxns544.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ebshqdjyao281.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028eevwajtbjh385.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ejjtzeniir478.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ekvphkyyhz957.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028elombqypcy379.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ezliwmfmrr435.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028faamqnywos569.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028fflcigaupf574.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028filmdcxaby274.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028fopbtiayae420.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028fuljvckezx865.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028fyrbgdumbc556.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ggsroexodl373.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028gnhnrhyyco925.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028goxejbswbj896.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028gpgfthtano684.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028gqhhjotrkm256.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028grcnjbsuej960.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028gsebnyvuql627.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hajojqvgqo967.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hbvxzvuewg262.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hduilfndob164.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hebqkhjdzy123.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hfbgoqlbkf977.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hiddzakjbl142.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hiyupnifda852.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hqxdasqmvh170.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hqxomehypa853.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028huwgfdlrhk725.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028hvkgjpvmjv487.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028illmrdkttq752.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ixjhmuidgc753.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028izbrtcyexf896.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jetkynvlvi938.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jhdgqxxadu909.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jnpuhxdesa945.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jpolcjuire852.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jqgxumbmpn804.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jtmixulwgn642.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jvagkxhjeu815.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jyasymjtcw981.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028jzidzlfwqs732.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028kgcrjivhrc851.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028kpsjlqpxqg717.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-26&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.