Flagged newborn domains, Monday, October 26, 2026

6,657 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001028kxqyyfjdqg198.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028lpqvxhvkrm951.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028lvhczprbtb369.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028lzckocesuq158.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028mhpghmloqa415.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028mixctpxqqt357.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028mqugcxvrvn331.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028mtxqiwbnnd214.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028mxrzsgfcoc555.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028naqgypqcar855.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nhstkwxdur336.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nltbpdoyuf312.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028npbunsrjiz827.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nqzzfzcoax278.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nthktcjryg343.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nvqpfdsbop324.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nwdnwuoati842.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028nxqnupceon339.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028oieandlpql562.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028ompoqittsd791.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028osdndipexa189.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028owqiufzxbm225.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028pciqdzjxty450.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.92”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028pdnufvxyfc803.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028pgchozfics958.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028plzewlujbt982.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028prgvrkdnfl240.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qagygxzdqt389.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qfnmsfwqwa690.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qikyhlxrwq614.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qoekrkawts595.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qpyxqesuim969.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028qsduecsfcs485.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028revdbnfcgt434.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rhreslwyxf204.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rlwpkvoplb799.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rmocysyhux875.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rmvialxaxw745.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rpbtiztjgy915.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rpsbieznmc891.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rpwhfimqrf668.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rqxdtndwpe194.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028rupstiqiuh873.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028sdkkxozrtw809.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028sldhnyrgct805.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028sqgyqrfjyt690.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028sscefaueok829.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028sscjewjnha851.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028svgjfnxdtn386.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001028swjnkxxylo503.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-10-26&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.