Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001108aqmwngxsyi282.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108arvxxouizu563.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108asmlpcfwaf153.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108atobnrxaki781.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108auntwhrcmw507.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108axpbvfmvta269.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108bifuafhuud534.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108bnmxlufaii834.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108bofftauvpg911.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108brnbkiqygy149.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108bvvqtvrlqj779.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108bymcuyeueg397.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cazoulfuvt655.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ceazsrsuqi182.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cejshfptyz310.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cfptvatzom832.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cgsnnuburw713.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cgwuwyuxus437.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cktbgaofpw155.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cnwegbpidb140.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ctsccvlrez365.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ctyspjfbhp961.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108cwdebiezgx965.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108detqyzplde568.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108dfmgcvnnxb902.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108dpjpjxrybf587.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108dquuzrvfsf953.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ecbioexfpx543.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108eeyyvjmoiw964.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108egfpntpvmm922.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108eqmvcnqkrd585.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108erblxftnbk166.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108fdbizxrefd786.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108fkbakhhsgb706.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108flaivkxfom936.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108fmecmusgel763.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108fnjlyekiav591.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108fpwcubonrc270.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108gamoeupgpn963.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108geupcoieel856.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108gewykhsfim283.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ghcdsacwzj556.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108guadkofqaz510.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108gvmpjnjbjl727.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108gydigkeleo942.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108hmuehwlsmj864.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108hwodlgcnqv143.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108iaksmsxeec346.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108iclwqugvng257.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108inuexbzwdo362.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.