Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001108pxdmvjpcxe597.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qbdsuvfuro219.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qfuhatwkps557.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qldfqgmjwr163.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qmswcmpfvd481.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qnudszyimw773.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qukmvpqcwg922.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qusoixuqdz929.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qwdcnjkptw735.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108qzfnfprizr267.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108rfifljqrce135.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108rgpevixdne643.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108rhquyzirgp547.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108rzdgsherzx508.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108scylyhyjfx914.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.71”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108smaieqxuyy329.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108smyybgnqud895.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108sproqpzqpy752.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108sraxkktuta425.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108swuecmoaaf168.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108tqhcxknnmk149.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ualhduwhsq936.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ubqqgzhbme598.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uhjfwupcxc794.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uitqywympz136.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uksisaqwbm677.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108umhdadorwq616.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108umqrkbjnqy699.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108umwfrmteza878.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uphuxejrst788.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108upqqpekeoq596.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108upvranglkx518.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uqmishagyq754.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108urptawrgmn231.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108utgafnugdy358.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108uyghmydupw789.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108vdoiyuuopv546.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108vknjwwapxu939.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108vkzcsmvgjz873.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108voicmewzwp339.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108vqrkqomnyj970.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108vwdtxfgrtr879.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108wgehuzidqe664.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108wqdggnusrs938.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108xndkyemyii740.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108xnxqatwruk872.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108xoejcjyjba786.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108xrayngpfvt827.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yfklkimdzt769.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yfxsdmoywz114.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.