Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001108ygnkckpojn703.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yknlqebcpt989.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yowhxdotco960.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yperwdadeo396.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108ypgrrpjdlk955.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yrsxprzekr196.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.71”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108yvwubvionf295.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zawkodfmzn386.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zlfbphsvgm743.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zmbmlgelgr694.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108znbyaawitq136.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zqefkeozbu478.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zvyilbrftv682.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zwbyiixuzs124.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001108zztkfvdtgb417.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115agjlaablne907.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115avmpvnvffc449.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115awqrxjrmts239.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115axqpslmqkh175.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115baknltgyer685.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115bbfrtxqzbu429.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115blchgpagrj947.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115caxshrdfom901.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115cpqrofzuwo840.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115cvdqhssquf146.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115daivgtzdij471.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dceaekuobe784.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dgohpfvsfr900.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dpnkqubfuf534.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dpqkivggbu686.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dsoiodmghx852.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dstkpajbux230.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dwrtndqybz270.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115dxrwqkocin529.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ebosvrsupc464.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ehxeivruzo426.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115eiurjsgipl345.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115emraonavxh276.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115epmyoimegj986.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115epufhxpkly992.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115eqrcgqcepn840.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115fbaugqaipf504.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115fchzivhfdc976.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ficibebhaz296.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115fvorlwccwg613.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115fzxjfaolbt451.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115gallobwdff492.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115gcxtuhegnv799.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115gdctvqrjpv395.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115gimjszfrvu746.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.