Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001115nuwbizckye962.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115nvqwsjmvgs365.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115nwudqekwth427.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115nyrnlpzowh835.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115okumwcjiff696.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115onvncctzhe942.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115otkconwuny179.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115pdzxbmohoy503.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115plqxmnipel538.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qafdhkzumz281.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qfhdazvtjq451.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qirbvfozad351.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qkrwqtxuuh708.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qrzeoykygb165.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115qtmxvqwypm403.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115rbcziqzdji708.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115rhlzwulgyp868.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115rlkihnfrse812.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115rukfrhktpv926.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115rupppdncoa880.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115sdpldruysg529.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115sisvvapthu435.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115slzdkmpjuy991.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115smrbevvhcy299.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115spbnjsgtly664.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tagolipxlo309.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tbwsirdknd743.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tcnmavktlr473.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tkguwclavh511.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tkmpyhmngf848.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tlqbptacvy803.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tnbiwpjjvk587.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115tqqbrbpxil858.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ttnnrukzcx467.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ueyeznobhz544.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ukqghyciaq153.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115uvlvhbadqq916.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115vblzfaiywq341.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115vfepehgowd124.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115vieklsozkq324.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115vrkhafqybj280.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115vuhorqhcyw705.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wicfubrhfn957.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wioqkvfwku397.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wiwfgnwpou687.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wjdvhmzdcq208.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wmmrkbpaey905.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wxjngsgtnf590.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wylqdqohog546.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115wzggldfuox125.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.