Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001115wzpaucgrrx969.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xayrbgfqhm288.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xdejaamzbu454.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xfatzwnefw214.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xhqbrwavyz528.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xjkzijxxsa878.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xkfnqfxdel922.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xlytshnfyu620.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xmlkdysrkl461.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xmtqkozrnh782.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xwxkdyoytd827.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115xyntxbsgdo454.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yaefncjjvh124.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ycjgcqonxl329.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yiwlhkwhbq722.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yjayhhqeum422.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yndeulqykr884.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115ypdlhypsfr470.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yuqagbxnnu598.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yvujuogecc574.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yxvvghjbwf252.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115yyuwjycmgh971.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zeelmgmyri559.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zfjzkpsseb166.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zlatqwuvmx334.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zlqvtjcyjw394.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zphhysrzud935.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zpprcujkth417.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zqyqydauwo193.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zurvanwsic121.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zvjkuzdvac192.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zvnemnctln864.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zvsacgayiq732.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001115zwyclolcjk247.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118adhmzozvlt900.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118azeykjrloc737.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118brukdwqded147.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118ctmdmfjyoz483.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118cvxbxkwozd636.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118cwmsruigex653.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118dlinjfxizz688.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118ecmjlkatsd876.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118emdchmkivg156.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118exlgnrhbtu681.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118fszstrwepi794.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118gzkhkbtksc875.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118hqmnkptgli827.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118jbexifswqu681.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118jmhcnyjixa746.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118jphvwpisyg791.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.