Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001118jqorbvqfap744.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118llxltbehjf524.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118obcvgtgbzv149.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118ogmdnieozs992.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118oqzifnyhoq845.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118pecswqselp676.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118povrycujgz348.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118pqnyxfukef600.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118pyijpfvryo845.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118pzvaunayih669.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118rcyktnutxk179.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118rdwocwhfln627.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118romtnvuysq203.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118tfhnistiav177.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118uawuknzmof873.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118uimqxbozwc707.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118umqznzemvh209.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118urkmtivbnm281.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118ushswdxuls470.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118vvrumaebgq304.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118wlpnidyhco430.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118wsvajcidjh998.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118xhrsyakinu689.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118xovmwqkowd435.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118xysurcvmcu258.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001118yuwfotrexj927.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120achwktotnj372.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120apctftqyrm845.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120belpzhadjr349.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120bjkvalsqaf245.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120bljonergdx796.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120bppdutvakc871.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120btoaqmuhow266.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120bvomfygmyt684.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120bznmjhjuec418.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120cbcurwjhgo336.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ccskprotsh996.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120chtyxbsoyp404.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120cqmrtccxvl644.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dgkxncezxr448.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dgtzjkzwva381.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ditkqishwf841.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dvfxgbucgo478.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dwfebkvyrb504.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dzidbpohcm774.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120dzjapnlmpl956.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ehptwonobb709.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ejhdvzgxuj458.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120fcdljzsgqz236.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120fnzuzgrtuf745.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.