Flagged newborn domains, Sunday, November 1, 2026

7,024 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low32001120gazktusfpx384.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120gkdooausqw506.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120gqmpcdaqje983.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120gybejzhjwb347.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120himlphmvxa658.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hlflpoluyg486.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hmqkqpnlcq446.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hnqaoffsnr566.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hopryjjzui188.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hwjynwubrw346.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120hzyclqwtvl326.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ieywzkzjfj965.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ilqgoheagp605.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ioogrkmffh955.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ipjyhptuzq949.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120itlexdfouh771.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120ixnwvdvzbo388.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120izpjffytmt257.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jjltobcwov873.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jktlgcrnrr795.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jpnqelkawh995.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jpvemmfnbq691.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jqnzaofvwp514.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120jxqozfyxbr621.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120kabrouwegn841.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120kajwncpqyt198.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120khjqnqyptj863.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120khudkrfjzo414.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120khvizrhxbq786.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120kiaqthtvzs404.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120kjfskonujy845.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120klbvwqrouh965.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120krtndglryb506.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120linkyrqbgs748.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lkzffapmrn361.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lpqjznfoxj379.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lquqrrhpfa892.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lselbwonzg832.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lvmexguhpr565.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120lxphoprxsg969.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120mbxfotlaio663.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120mjwmkszpjm589.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120nvnwcyioeo841.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120oarkdtndnf499.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120odvoeucgdw456.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120oleuwlspnm652.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120onkcypcqzm571.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120pdltojsjmw361.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120pekvmelvdn369.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low32001120pisrtwbvzm640.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-01&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.