Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026
7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.
Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “winner”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
brand in the name “outlook”
many hyphens “3”TLD with a high abuse rate “autos”
brand in the name “outlook”
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”form submits over plain HTTP “http://worksimpliai.top/”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “wallet”TLD with a high abuse rate “click”
brand in the name “amazon”
brand in the name “stripe”
brand in the name “wellsfargo”
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”form submits over plain HTTP “http://yxpf1314.top/”
many hyphens “3”TLD with a high abuse rate “skin”
page pushes urgent payment “risk-free”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “bonus”TLD with a high abuse rate “sbs”
ambiguous brand word “kraken”identical page on many newborns “49 identical pages”
login form “has_form+login words”
login form “has_form+login words”
login form “has_form+login words”
many hyphens “3”TLD with a high abuse rate “skin”
many hyphens “3”TLD with a high abuse rate “rest”
random-looking name “H=3.64”TLD with a high abuse rate “icu”
random-looking name “H=3.80”TLD with a high abuse rate “cyou”
random-looking name “H=3.64”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.77”TLD with a high abuse rate “icu”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.