Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026

7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low34001102fbwdnwqhjl942.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fdvlzqagdd466.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102flgbiblzep546.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fpgtfrjggo858.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fprjirrkxu776.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fxynmwlugt199.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fyjxhvgohj758.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102fzoeylmyiz885.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102getdnegfrn568.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102gkbhvytstx964.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102glqaqsrmns483.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102gpgmeckhnk383.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102gsyvqqmznt271.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102hneznpoxtq377.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102houzrafikx818.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102hpgdjuskqq263.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102hpyriqccyo774.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102iqktjdqnrp433.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102iqmuuaeegy896.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102iymmjaswmw878.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102jauppaygmt621.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102jmxfwrvvzb513.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102jqomsrzcra898.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102kdlrljhesa720.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102kjohgflccr905.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102kucwklyzej564.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102kvaxgcupte733.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102kybpbjfmiu509.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ldaisjjazx249.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102lpwhajbban687.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mahnqgovhx363.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mhqpevncdf410.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mhscfdjnac987.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mjmblgwtlq782.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mligcdsyxv261.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mseldiqgae870.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mwqpjlxuld127.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mxuezxwejh239.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102mxyrkftaqk165.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102nbfsasexql298.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102nmsitvlqso852.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102nqfwejoufn866.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102nxbivvlokm942.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102oauxpoqarw531.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ogijmjbcqy488.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102oqqtsmfqdj379.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102oqzrsrjyzi265.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102orivqnhjfb223.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102oviijqmebd321.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102owiynvpljm579.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.