Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026

7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low34001102pkhztschyj859.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102pnjqkzcdty778.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102poxbzxtumv370.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qdduxyjsxi722.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qimwkowclx520.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qixsbgpacy959.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qlpzlvjtnt826.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qondocwogp739.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qshbgxtsiv215.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qvthmcofne712.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102qwzdkytikf808.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rahzwelfww129.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rcroezxmyk642.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rkslaetliw295.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rsnmdyeiac633.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rtdokhqhjw628.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rvsikcwugk748.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102rxpuzsvtfs667.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102saqmitnfry787.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102sehvucjwwf762.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102sgxstmcrvr967.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102snhepjjwoa993.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102soipgilobx238.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102sprdbsenou768.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102sqjmkhaihz116.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102srxijraief883.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tbkljsdzdd279.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tepdkqzjus300.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tfasnhmcje220.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tkdlgaefoc993.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tuanjxdcpk382.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102tytumriyys558.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ubebxldefu961.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ubjhzjgqal426.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ujhzetilfu616.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102uktjqfbhhv761.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ulsveowewf356.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102uqjkkcemdd536.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102uwzzpjxxrj625.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102uxkplmsnhd821.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vaqcnofbvr235.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vequpjljjb978.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vrsebrwzmi595.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vtcwentrdc497.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vtljhvwsni530.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vwyrkqzrus319.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102vwzofpwiax134.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wdgoitcwyh671.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wdhmyhcpob715.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wiknfdujyc815.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.