Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026

7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low34001102wlkakiybtc613.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wqyicpvusq396.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wtwurcywvj854.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102wxymxckbbr737.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102xckxpxdmlf777.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102xkkrsgijeg169.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102xkocwbipgp251.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102xnjdbnaplv294.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102xondxyslex513.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yaofjkxbhw216.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ycrkojnoqx194.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yejjhczgto880.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ygqumvihsv858.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yimssatgtq754.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yndsrukboq806.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.92”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ypxmhpywge506.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yrflirdzbc355.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yukqjinpxw764.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102yulrorpzhm491.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102zepcmjozrh582.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102zltkeadbrs110.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102znwjafzcgj929.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102zpbjyoiwwv908.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102zpnluvsxak647.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102zqaicqmnvg932.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001102ztrxcjtusr738.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108alzwexartz861.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108apaafjsrwc156.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.71”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108apopbwjfpl491.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108auzdorrsee323.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108bbfshifryq245.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108bhfslgmdxv550.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108bkhltbughl571.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108bmjkyozssd451.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108bpeztfcpkz268.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108btsvexpdrc602.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.92”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108buiszulqfy119.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108cgglpwcoql772.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108cjwfkawbtz904.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ckszzfcuad956.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108clbjdazsrc455.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108coqeobdqwt821.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108cudhlgazfv644.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108cvpspwqujz285.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108cziycmmrns753.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108czrilqupvo452.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108dbuvfcwztg732.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108dcrovrajan276.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108dcsecvlahu992.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ddrxbwieno587.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.