Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026

7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low34001108lugwswudfw216.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.62”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108lvblexmmdh972.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108lwkuxfehtz328.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108lyyzntmche175.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mcnaasmdhn673.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mhusruyybe681.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mkufsnvoaj142.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mkvyxuwrqy852.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mpbacuyvbi995.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mutrfasuzu899.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mvpktikwhw886.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108mydxbrcrnz452.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108nfnqigumfs265.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108niatwobilo548.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108nutizvxyjf732.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108oeonmodusi432.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ofihukygmm563.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108oftiwthxdc149.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ouqmveirut336.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108owdhlaqsmj273.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108oxgbyvcddp619.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pjsbthwsip512.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pldwxavygu726.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108plxgawekpo589.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pmteuiysof206.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.92”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pnfjqjxrmv893.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pscaxreudk204.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.82”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ptgbtxdeaw813.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pwboqslmhd400.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pwduyjvqxt565.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pwlztzacfz679.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108pyyhvzdgtf634.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108qcosnjmtac955.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108qkzrzalrne769.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108qrthbazgre642.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108qrzyyzhdwx982.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108qvmgsbjfxu695.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108radypygksj523.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108rahxdaogvp843.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108rbbwmldqxw204.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108rwmgwooutk541.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108rxwapebryz499.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108saotfpkvbo924.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108solscexzdz390.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108ssqwpohvft689.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108sukogdocft548.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108svrvxbmsbz229.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108syabpnaglx926.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108sycwnbajiz378.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001108tcjmuihwcr757.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.