Flagged newborn domains, Monday, November 2, 2026

7,321 names at tier low or above, highest score first.

Signals, not verdicts. A domain appears here because heuristics matched its name, its infrastructure or the page it served on its first day. Where a model has looked at it, that is shown as an opinion with a confidence, not as a finding. Nothing on this page says a site is malicious. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

Own one of these names and think the listing is wrong? Tell us and a person will look.

Low34001120hrloxnrrss592.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120hsyflijwgt912.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120hyoggpsoif580.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ilmypjstni388.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ilnszddabv875.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120inolfqwnby715.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120iphfwfklbo681.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120irlqkdtkuf804.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ittdsdgyrh275.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ixmbenejnv980.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jdcgdxgjrl907.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jebcontaec272.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jevudgtcjh224.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jgkyjxnvdx480.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jsdgzdwkhh452.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jxiuknmosa446.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120jyqbeptwar586.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=4.07”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120kcbovrcafo276.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120kkfntlgctg379.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.69”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120knagqcdnpw827.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120kprmqntski997.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120lfjfypviue992.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120lgupegruxh606.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120lkmkfsccvt858.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ltmyonxfxf603.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120lukradocjn175.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.94”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mbrqsikabj378.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mglfbgzdiv669.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mlxaveaiow556.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mpdqjattlq174.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mpezzonaql384.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.78”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mqejtahkix123.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120mragjkfgox306.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.73”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120nirhxttlyk153.topscore 13· boilerplate page
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120nllqrsppfx919.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120nmsfitindk702.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120nrrsohoymv614.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120nttyvdrqfv602.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120oajigudjsu689.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ofdurynyib551.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ojrnuxuvuy951.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.71”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120okxapmhhfu225.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120onsunoadug905.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.63”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ougbstvmkd637.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.98”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ounsjhvkjy692.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120parduonnpw975.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120pcalodffqi186.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.84”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120pcisaiwhxl319.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.75”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120phligcsvpv895.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.88”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
Low34001120ppfvpqddwv896.topscore 13· no DNS
random-looking name “H=3.65”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”

Same data as JSON: /api/zone/risk?day=2026-11-02&tier=low. Screenshots and the model's reasoning are on each domain's evidence page.