one-letter brand typo “finance≈binance”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED”
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name on a rarely-seen nameserver “ns2vp1vps1pro.pro”brand name at a retail registrar “NameSilo, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameSilo, LLC”
one-letter brand typo “lcloud≈icloud”brand name on a rarely-seen nameserver “sigtryg.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameSilo, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameSilo, LLC”
brand in the name “gmail”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc.”identical page on many newborns “3963 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Google (Gmail)), confidence 62%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “gocgle≈google”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Gname.com Pte. Ltd.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Gname.com Pte. Ltd.”
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”
brand in the name “icloud”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc.”identical page on many newborns “3963 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Apple (iCloud)), confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “iedger≈ledger”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameSilo, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameSilo, LLC”
brand in the name “google”brand name at a retail registrar “Tucows Domains Inc”identical page on many newborns “3963 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Google), confidence 60%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “icioud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com, LLC”
brand in the name “kakao”brand name at a retail registrar “SNAPNAMES 72, LLC”identical page on many newborns “664 identical pages”
Model opinion: suspicious (target: Kakao), confidence 55%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “mobile≈tmobile”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com, LLC”
one-letter brand typo “lcloud≈icloud”brand name on a rarely-seen nameserver “clouddns-j1k.pro”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com, LLC”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Apple), confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “mizuo≈mizuho”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com LLC”
one-letter brand typo “openri≈openai”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Gname.com Pte. Ltd.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Gname.com Pte. Ltd.”
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “reward”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”page pushes urgent payment “Claim your Reward”brand in page title, not in the name “walmart”
Model opinion: looks like a scam (target: Walmart), confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “santander”brand name at a retail registrar “GoDaddy.com, LLC”identical page on many newborns “46 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: Santander), confidence 77%. An opinion, not a finding.
lure words (login, verify, secure…) “taxes”page impersonates a brand “PayPal”brand in page title, not in the name “paypal”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 85%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “vanguard”brand name at a retail registrar “Synergy Wholesale Accreditations Pty Ltd”identical page on many newborns “259 identical pages”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 40%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “leger≈ledger”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “NameCheap, Inc.”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 72%. An opinion, not a finding.
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”
one-letter brand typo “verivon≈verizon”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Sav.com, LLC”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Sav.com, LLC”
one-letter brand typo “cloud≈icloud”brand name behind Cloudflare “cloudflare.com”brand name at a retail registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”brand name at a watch-list registrar “Spaceship, Inc.”
punycode name “奶奶奶奶龍 scripts=CJK”brand in the name “usaa”brand plus digits “xn--yusaaa9280g”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
punycode name “奶奶奶奶龙 scripts=CJK”brand in the name “usaa”brand plus digits “xn--yusaaa9880g”TLD with a high abuse rate “top”
TLD with a high abuse rate “lol”brand in page title, not in the name “wordpress”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 74%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 42%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “cloudflare”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 80%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “cloudflare”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
brand in the name “whatsapp”brand plus digits “2wap-whatsapp”brand name at a retail registrar “Guizhou Zhongyu Zhike Network Technology”
TLD with a high abuse rate “cfd”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 40%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand in page title, not in the name “whatsapp”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 68%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “whatsapp”brand plus digits “3wap-whatsapp”brand name at a retail registrar “Guizhou Zhongyu Zhike Network Technology”
brand in the name “whatsapp”brand plus digits “4wap-whatsapp”brand name at a retail registrar “Guizhou Zhongyu Zhike Network Technology”
brand in the name “binance”brand plus digits “779243-binance”brand name at a retail registrar “PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com”
TLD with a high abuse rate “homes”brand in page title, not in the name “whatsapp”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 82%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 40%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: looks benign, confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 44%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 47%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 41%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “alipay”TLD with a high abuse rate “autos”brand name at a retail registrar “Hefei Juming Network Technology Co., Ltd”
Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: AlipayHK), confidence 70%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “alipay”TLD with a high abuse rate “homes”brand name at a retail registrar “Hefei Juming Network Technology Co., Ltd”
Model opinion: looks like abuse (target: AlipayHK), confidence 70%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “alipay”TLD with a high abuse rate “makeup”brand name at a retail registrar “Hefei Juming Network Technology Co., Ltd”
Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: AlipayHK), confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “alipay”TLD with a high abuse rate “monster”brand name at a retail registrar “Hefei Juming Network Technology Co., Ltd”
brand in the name “alipay”TLD with a high abuse rate “skin”brand name at a retail registrar “Hefei Juming Network Technology Co., Ltd”
Model opinion: looks like phishing (target: AlipayHK), confidence 95%. An opinion, not a finding.
TLD with a high abuse rate “top”brand in page title, not in the name “google”form on a brand-styled page “has_form”
Model opinion: suspicious, confidence 40%. An opinion, not a finding.
brand in the name “amazon”TLD with a high abuse rate “xyz”brand name at a retail registrar “Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş.”